Flooring Systems, Inc. v. Beaulieu Group, LLC
| Flooring Systems, Inc. |
| Beaulieu Group, LLC |
| 4:2015cv01792 |
| December 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -......IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administratively CLOSE this action, subject to reopening on a motion filed in compliance with this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions are denied without prejudice to be refiled in the event the case is reopened. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the jury trial set for February 5, 2018 is vacated.,Terminate Case. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/21/2017. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of third-party defendant Clayco, Inc., to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a claim [Doc. # 50 ] is granted.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 5/19/16. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of third-party defendant Next Architecture, L.P., to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction [Doc. # 39 ] is granted.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 5/10/16. (KKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
