Gordon v. Dotson et al
| Chad J. Gordon |
| Dewight M. Meeks, Steven P. Wilson, Lori J. Rebholz, Larry J. Dampier, Samuel Dotson, III, Frances Slay, Thomas Irwin, Bettye Battle-Turner, Richard H. Gray, Erwin O. Switzer and Matthew M. Watson |
| 4:2015cv01845 |
| December 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. As discussed during today's scheduling conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that parties shall file a revised joint proposed scheduling plan by no later than Wednesday, April 27, 2016. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 4/20/2016. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration 25 is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/16/16. (EAB)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss 8 is granted, and Counts VII and VIII and the official capacity only claims alleged in Count VI are dismissed. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on February 4, 2016. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for remand 15 is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 02/02/2016. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
