Slack v. McHugh et al
| Robert L. Slack |
| John M. McHugh and Department of Army |
| 4:2015cv01853 |
| December 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Franklin |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall substitute Robert M. Speer, in his capacity as the Acting Secretary of the Department of the Army, as the proper party defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Exhibits D and E toDefendants Motion for Summary Judgment and Portions of Testimony of James Rudy and Douglas Jump (ECF No. 38.) is DENIED as moot. 20 20 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/7/17. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall substitute Patrick J. Murphy, in his capacity as the Acting Secretary of the Department of the Army, as the proper party defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Department of the Army is dismissed as a defendant in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 2 ) is DENIED., Patrick J Murphy added. Department of Army (Agency) terminated. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 03/11/2016. (CLK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
