Wenzel et al v. Bourbon, Missouri, City of et al
Plaintiff: Eric Wenzel, Annie Alley and Thelma Wenzel
Defendant: Bourbon, Missouri, City of and Carl Storm
Case Number: 4:2016cv00027
Filed: January 8, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: David D. Noce
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 113 MEMORANDUM: For the reasons stated above, defendant Carl Storms motion for reconsideration, considered a motion for relief under F. R. Civ. P. 54(b) from the Court's failure to grant him summary judgment earlier, must be sustained. An appropriate Judgment Order, granting defendant Carl Storm summary judgment on the remaining state law claims in Counts 3, 4, and 5 is issued herewith. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 2/12/2019. (CLO)
April 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM: For the reasons stated above, on Count 1 the cross-motions of plaintiffs and defendant Storm for summary judgment are denied; on Counts 3, 4, and 5 the motion of defendant City of Bourbon for summary judgment is granted; and on Counts 3, 4, and 5 the motion of defendant Carl Storm for summary judgment is denied. An appropriate Order is issued herewith. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 4/13/2017. (CLO)
March 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant City of Bourbon to dismiss Count Two (Doc. 6) is sustained. Plaintiffs claim under Count Two is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 3/14/2016. (KMS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wenzel et al v. Bourbon, Missouri, City of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Wenzel
Represented By: James W. Schottel, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annie Alley
Represented By: James W. Schottel, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thelma Wenzel
Represented By: James W. Schottel, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bourbon, Missouri, City of
Represented By: Mark H. Zoole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl Storm
Represented By: Mark H. Zoole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?