Williams v. USA
Petitioner: Terrick Alfred Williams
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2016cv00033
Filed: January 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion for certification to seek a successive habeas in this Court 14 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 5/3/2018. (CAR)
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion for stay Doc. # 10 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 2/28/17. (ARL)
January 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant motion to vacate is DENIED, without prejudice, because movant did not obtain permission from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to bring the motion in this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (h). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall TRANSFER the instant motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the Federal Public Defender. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/12/16. (cc: FPD) (ARL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?