Precision Rx Compounding, LLC et al v Express Scripts Holding Company et al
| Precision Rx Compounding, LLC, C & M Health Pro, LLC, Northern VA Compounders, PLLC, TOTH Enterprises II, PA, The Daily Dose, LP and CPRX Pharmacy, LP |
| Express Scripts Holding Company and Express Scripts, Inc. |
| 4:2016cv00069 |
| January 15, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Within US but Outside District |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and for Stay 173 of Steven Bloch and the law firm of Silver Golub & Teitell LLP and Richard Quardrino, Eugene S.R. Pagano, and Harold Levy, and the law firm of Quadrin o Law Group, P.C. is held in abeyance. Counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel for counterclaim defendants will be held in abeyance and the Court imposes a withdrawal notice period until July 31, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Precision Rx Com pounding, LLC and C&M Health Pro LLC shall obtain substitute counsel no later than July 31, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Precision Rx Compounding, LLC and C&M Health Pro, LLC's substitute counsel, if any, shall file an entry of appearance no later than July 31, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for counterclaim defendants shall provide a copy of this memorandum and order to Precision Rx Compounding, LLC and C&M Health Pro, LLC via first class mail, postage prepaid, and via email and file a notice with the Court of Counsel's compliance with this directive within ten days of this memorandum and order. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that on July 31, 2018, or upon entry of substitute counsel, whichever comes earlier, the Court will issue an order granting the motions to withdraw Steven Bloch and the law firm of Silver Golub & Teitell LLP and Richard J. Quadrino, Eugene S.R. Pagano, and Harold Levy, and the law firm Quadrino Law Group, P.C. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 6/28/18. (KXS)
|
Filing
157
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Express Scripts' Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Incorporated Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 134 ) is DENIED, in part, and MOOT, in part. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Express Scripts& #039; Motion to Compel Production of Documents and incorporated Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 138 ) is DENIED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Express Scripts' Motion to Set Deadline for Substantial Completion of Plaintiffs' Document Production and Incorporated Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 147 ) is GRANTED, in part. Plaintiffs shall make a substantial production of documents within the next thirty (30) days in response to Express Scripts' Third Set of Requests for Production. The parties shall immediate recommence negotiations regarding search terms and come to an agreement within five (5) days. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 05/07/2018. (KCB)
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs first amended complaint [Doc. # 38 ] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' request for oral argument on their motion to dismiss [Doc. # 57 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 8/24/2016. (CLO)
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Precision Plaintiffs Motion to Join Cases For Pretrial Purposes is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/16/2016. (KMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.