Chance v. Pasha et al
| Jason Chance |
| Christy Pasha, Daniel Bryan, Richard White, Shawn Jenkins and Cindy Griffith |
| 4:2016cv00082 |
| January 20, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Washington |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER - Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order dated April 8, 2016, in which the Court ordered plaintiff to submit either the filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. As a result, this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 5/19/2016. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court 9;s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis - Prisoner Cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Court provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pl aintiff shall either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he m ust also submit a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 3 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for injunction is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 4 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed, the dismissal will not constitute a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/8/16. (JWD)
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court 9;s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis - Prisoner Cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Court provided form within (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintif f shall either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must als o submit a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed, the dismissal will not constitute a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Response to Court due by 3/11/2016.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 2/10/2016. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
