Energizer Brands, LLC v. Proctor & Gamble Company, et al
| Energizer Brands, LLC |
| Procter & Gamble Company, Gillette Company and Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. |
| 4:2016cv00223 |
| February 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc.s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. ECF No. 65 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within seven (7) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, the parties s hall file a joint notice advising the Court whether any part of their motions to exclude expert testimony (ECF Nos. 71 & 75 ) relates to the counterclaim remaining in this case, and if so, which part(s). Failure to comply with this Order will result in the denial of these motions as moot. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/27/2017. (KCB)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants motion to dismiss [Doc. #29] is granted as to defendants The Procter & Gamble Company and denied as to defendant Duracell U.S. Operations, Inc. An order of partial dismissal order will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 5/18/2016. (KMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
