Skaggs v. Colvin
||Carolyn W. Colvin
||February 19, 2016
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||Nannette A. Baker
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 24, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Application for Attorneys Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED. [Doc. 27.]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Social Security Administration shall remit to Plaintiff, attorneys fees in the amount of $4,956.06, subject to any pre-existing debt that the Plaintiff owes the United States. 27 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 4/24/18. (CLA)
|November 21, 2017
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the relief which Skaggs seeks in her Complaint and Brief in Support of Plaintiffs Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Docs. 1 , 15 , 21 .] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the ALJs decisi on of August 25, 2014 is REVERSED and REMANDED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Judgment of Reversal and Remand will be filed contemporaneously with this Memorandum and Order remanding this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further cons ideration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence 4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall substitute Nancy A. Berryhill for Carolyn W. Colvin in the court record of this case. (Nancy A. Berryhill added. Carolyn W. Colvin (Acting Commissioner of SSA) terminated.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 11/21/17. (KJS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?