Davis v. Jomp, et al.
Frederick P. Davis |
Sandra Boylan, Doris Brooks, Gayle Ellerbeck, Aaron Evans, Melanie Hinkle, John Jomp, Kerry Klein, Lori Langley, Teri Lawson, Stanley G. Lucas, Shannon McCarty, Melba Miller, Dale Phillips, Claire Stadt and Troy Steele |
4:2016cv00229 |
February 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Francois |
Charles A. Shaw |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 184 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 144 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs state law defamation claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file in paper format under seal the seventy-four documents listed on defendants' privilege log that were submitted to the Court for in camera review. These documents shall not be scanne d or otherwise reproduced, except for copies made for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. An appropriate judgment and order of dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/5/18. (JWD) |
Filing 181 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Injunction Relief is DENIED. [Doc. 109] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Pro Se Motion Fraud in This Judicial Proceeding and Attempt to Commi t Fraud on the Court and Requested Sanctions is DENIED. [Doc. 115] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses to the Defendants' Motion to Compel and Reply to Plaintiff's Fraud Complai nt if the Court Denies Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. [Doc. 135] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 60(b) is DENIED. [Doc. 134] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion Request for the Exhibits Submitted with the Plaintiffs Motion for Leave (Doc. 121) be Attached to the Plaintiff's Filed Response to Defendants Motion to Compel is GRANTED. [Doc. 141] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pla intiff's Motion to Strike Documents Defendants Have Used in Support of Their Summary Judgment Motion for Failure to Comply with Discovery Rules (Boylan Affidavit and Cote Housing History) is DENIED. [Doc. 154] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED tha t Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Documents Defendants Have Used in Support of Their Summary Judgment Motion For Failure to Comply with Discovery Rules (Davis Grievance Summary) is DENIED. [Doc. 156]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 8/14/2018. (MRC) |
Filing 90 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 45]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/20/2017. (MRC) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 10] An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/28/2016. (MRC) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [Doc. 4] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of Forty-Seven Dollars ($47.00) b y March 28, 2016.....IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a prisoner civil rights complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amended complaint no later than March 28, 2016. IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply fully and timely with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 3/28/2016., Response to Court due by 3/28/2016.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 2/26/2016. (MRC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.