CLINTON v. MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
ANDREA RACHELLE CLINTON |
Mentor Worldwide LLC |
4:2016cv00319 |
March 10, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Within US but Outside District |
Carol E. Jackson |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 147 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion to exclude the opinions and testimony of defendants expert Gonzalo R. Ballon- Landa, M.D., [Doc. # 104 ] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion to exclude th e opinions and testimony of defendants expert Marjorie Jeffcoat, D.M.D., [Doc. # 106 ] is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion to exclude the opinions and testimony of defendants expert Dr. Ruby Skin ner, M.D., [Doc. # 113 ] is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion to enforce Daubert orders [Doc. #112] is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants motion to exclude certain testimony from plaintiffs expert witnesses [Doc. # 108 ] is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 12/30/16. (JAB) |
Filing 144 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for protective order and/or to quash subpoena [Doc. # 130 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 12/12/2016. (CLO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.