Parshall v. Menard, Inc.
| Richard Parshall |
| Menard, Inc. |
| Daniel Streiberg |
| Menard, Inc. |
| 4:2016cv00828 |
| June 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 79 ] on the third-party complaint [Doc. # 5 ] is granted. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/23/2017. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend the scheduling Order [Doc. # 91 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that the following deadlines shall apply: All discovery in this case is to be completed by Jun e 1, 2017. Any motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment or motion for judgment on the pleadings, and any motion pursuant to Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), must be filed no later than July 1, 2017. The res ponse in opposition to such a motion will be due thirty days later, or no later than July 29, 2017; the reply in support of the motion will be due fourteen days after the response, or no later than August 12, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defend ant's motion to amend the March 8, 2017 order [Doc. # 96 ] is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's request for an additional time to comply with the March 8 order is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shal l have until April 21, 2017 to answer Interrogatory 11 and produce all documents responsive to Requests No. 8, 9, and 29. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that third-party defendant's motion for discovery conference [Doc. # 97 ] is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is removed from the trial docket of July 31, 2017. A new trial date, if necessary, will be scheduled following disposition of the pending motions in this case. ( Discovery Completion due by 6/1/2017., Dispositive Motions due by 7/1/2017.). Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/31/2017. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that third-party defendant's motion to compel [Doc. # 59 ] is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall have until March 28, 2017 to answer Interrogatory 11 and produce all documents responsive to Requests No. 8, 9, and 29. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/8/17. (KXS)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the renewed motion of defendant Menard, Inc. to strike plaintiffs objections [Doc. # 13 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until December 27, 2016, to answer defendants first set of interrogatories and to produce all documents responsive to defendants requests for production of documents. ( Response to Court due by 12/27/2016.) Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 12/12/2016. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to remand [Doc. # 25 ] is denied. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 7/20/16. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant Menard, Inc. to deny joinder of additional defendant [Doc. # 20 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs amended complaint [Doc. # 18 ] is stricken. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 7/19/16. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
