Schlattmann v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff: Robert Schlattmann
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Case Number: 4:2016cv01183
Filed: July 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 57 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, 50 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Robert Schlattmann. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment (#57) is DENIED and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (#50) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/4/18. (CSG)
October 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel shall file a report to the Court advising as to the status of Mr. Anthony's compliance and whether counsel wishes to withdraw the motion by October 16, 2017. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 10/6/17. (CSG)
August 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for contempt (#38) is HELD IN ABEYANCE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than September 7, 2017, non-party Matthew Anthony shall show cause in writing why an order should no t be issued pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 45 and 37 finding Mr. Anthony in contempt of Court for failure to comply with the subpoena served on him on June 2, 2017, awarding plaintiff his costs and attorneys' fees in the amount of $3,340, and issuing a writ of body attachment.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that non-party Matthew Anthony shall mail or hand-deliver his signed response to this Court and to counsel for the plaintiff.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the United States Marshal s Office for the Eastern District of Missouri shall serve upon Mr. Anthony this Order to Show Cause, plaintiff's Motion to Show Cause (#34, along with its exhibit), and plaintiff's Motion for Contempt (#38). Failure to comply with this Order may result in incarceration. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/22/17. (CSG)
July 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that nonparty Matthew Anthony is compelled to contact plaintiff's counsel Matthew Cook by July 28, 2017 to arrange for a mutually agreeable date and time, no later than August 9, 2017, on which Mr. Anth ony will appear for his deposition or otherwise satisfy plaintiffs counsels requests in accordance with the subpoena served upon him.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order by regular and certified mail, retu rn receipt requested, to the address on file with the Court (#35).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Anthony is advised that he will be held in contempt of this Court if he fails to abide by this Order, he will be assessed plaintiffs costs and fees as re quested, and he may be seized by the United States Marshals Office for the Eastern District of Missouri and incarcerated.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for contempt (#38) is HELD IN ABEYANCE until August 10, 2017, by which time pl aintiff shall file a report to the Court regarding Mr. Anthony's compliance with this Order.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the parties' dispositive motions deadline is continued to a date to-be-determined by agreement of the parties; plaintiff's report to the Court shall indicate the proposed new dispositive motions deadline.. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 7/19/17. (MRS)
February 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss (#22) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel is (#24) DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to c ompel is granted with respect to Interrogatories 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 13, and Requests for Production 1, 2, 3, and 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed protective order as described herein. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the motion to compel is denied with respect to Interrogatories 8 and 10 and Requests for Production 8, 11, 12, and 17. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/17/2017. (JMC)
February 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss :Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, 24 MOTION to Compel filed by Plaintiff Robert Schlattmann. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant' ;s motion to dismiss (#22) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel is (#24) DENIED in part and GRANTED in part.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to compel is granted with respect to Interrogatories 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, a nd 13, and Requests for Production 1, 2, 3, and 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a proposed protective order as described herein. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the motion to compel is denied with respect to Interrogatories 8 and 10 and Requests for Production 8, 11, 12, and 17. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/16/17. (CSG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schlattmann v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Schlattmann
Represented By: Matthew P. Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Represented By: Joshua C. Dickinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?