Durrell v. Tech Electronics, Inc.

Durrell v. Tech Electronics, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Robert Durrell
Defendant:	Tech Electronics, Inc.
Case Number:	4:2016cv01367
Filed:	August 24, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit:	Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 2617
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 15, 2016	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Robert Durrell's Amended Motion to File Second Amended Complaint 17 is GRANTED, and his original Motion to file Second Amended Complaint 15 is denied as moot. IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Tech Electronics, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counts IV, V, and VI of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 8 , which I construe to be directed to the second amended complaint, is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to dis miss plaintiffs claim of slander raised in Count IV. In all other respects, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Robert Durrell's Motion to File a Sur-Reply 12 is DENIED. This case will be set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference by separate Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/15/2016. (CBL)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 15, 2016

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Robert Durrell's Amended Motion to File Second Amended Complaint 17 is GRANTED, and his original Motion to file Second Amended Complaint 15 is denied as moot. IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Tech Electronics, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counts IV, V, and VI of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 8 , which I construe to be directed to the second amended complaint, is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to dis miss plaintiffs claim of slander raised in Count IV. In all other respects, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Robert Durrell's Motion to File a Sur-Reply 12 is DENIED. This case will be set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference by separate Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/15/2016. (CBL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Durrell v. Tech Electronics, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Durrell
Represented By:	Lawrence P. Kaplan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Tech Electronics, Inc.
Represented By:	Dennis C. Donnelly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?