Rousan v. Cassady et al
Petitioner: William Brent Rousan
Respondent: Jay Cassady and Chris Koster
Case Number: 4:2016cv01502
Filed: September 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge: Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Rousan's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (Doc. 47 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing that he has been denied a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 1/23/2024. (JEB)
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner William Brent Rousan's motion to lift stay (Doc. 40) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to lift the stay, and reopen this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat Petitioner's motion to appoint Joseph M. Hogan as counsel (Doc. 41) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a CJA 20 Appointment of Joseph M. Hogan and Authority to Pay Court Appointed Counsel shall issue on Petitioner's behalf. IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner, through CJA counsel, shall have sixty (60) days from the date of this Order to file a second amended petition. If the second amended petition is not filed by the deadline, this action may be dismissed without further notice to Petitioner. Case reopened. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on November 23, 2020. (Copy of both orders filed today were sent to William Rousan this date.(MCB)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is STAYED and administratively closed until Petitioner William Brent Rousan exhausts his state court remedies. Rousan must pursue state court remedies within 30 days after this stay is entered and return to federal court within 30 days after state court exhaustion is completed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley Padmore Mensah on 8/19/2019. (NEP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rousan v. Cassady et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William Brent Rousan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jay Cassady
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Chris Koster
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?