Shahid v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Sharhonda T. Shahid
Defendant: Kathryn East, Unknown Police Dispatcher, Unknown Jailer, Jarrod Coder, Christopher Easton, Unknown Prosecuting Attorney and Florissant Missouri, city of
Case Number: 4:2016cv01662
Filed: October 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. In accordance with the Memorandum and Order to Show Cause issued to plaintiff on September 6, 2017 60 , and plaintiff's response to the Order to Show Cause 61 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendant East are dismissed with prejudice, and paragraph 30 is stricken from plaintiff's complaint 7 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause is deemed satisfied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant East's motion to dismiss 33 is denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/20/2017. (CBL)
September 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than September 18, 2017, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why the Court should not enter sanctions, which may include monetary fines and/or the dismissal of some or al l of plaintiff's claims against defendant East, against her and/or her attorney for violating Rule 11(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by pleading that defendant East called the police and "advised [defendant police officers] t hat Plaintiff was armed or otherwise engaged in the commission of a felony offense," despite being in possession of the 911 and dispatch recordings which refute this allegation. No extensions of time will be granted. However, if plaintiff move s for a dismissal with prejudice of her claims against defendant East and to strike this allegation from the complaint by September 18, 2017, she need not comply with this Memorandum and Order to Show Cause. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the February 9, 2017 Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution 24 is vacated, and this case is no longer referred to mediation. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/6/2017. (CBL)
August 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than August 23, 2017, plaintiff shall deliver to my chambers a copy of the 911 and dispatch recordings described above. If a written transcript of the recordings is available, it shall also be provided to the Court by the same date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 8/18/17. (JAB)
July 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motions for summary judgment [ 29 , 35 ] are denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 7/10/2017. (CBL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shahid v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharhonda T. Shahid
Represented By: Rufus J. Tate, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathryn East
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Police Dispatcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Jailer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jarrod Coder
Represented By: Blake Daniel Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Easton
Represented By: Blake Daniel Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Prosecuting Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florissant Missouri, city of
Represented By: Blake Daniel Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?