Feather v. SSM Health Care et al
Lisa Feather |
SSM Health Care, Pension Committee for the Retirement Plan for SSM Employees and John Jane Doe 1-40 |
USA |
4:2016cv01669 |
October 26, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Within US but Outside District |
Henry Edward Autrey |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss for lack of standing [Doc. No. 82] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs FAC against Defendants is dismissed for lack of standing. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/23/18. (CLA) |
Filing 100 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 82 MOTION to Dismiss :Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant. The Court herebyGRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss with respect to Count IX of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint . The "church plan" exemption is a permissible accommodation of religion, as it has a secular legislative purpose, neither advances nor hinders religion, and avoids excessive government entanglement with religion. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/23/18. (KJS) |
Filing 58 ORDER DENYING 34 MOTION for Oral Argument and GRANTING 33 MOTION to Transfer Case. This case is hereby transferred to Eastern District of Missouri. Signed by Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/25/16. (klh2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.