Hain BluePrint, Inc. v. BluePrint Coffee, LLC
Plaintiff: Hain BluePrint, Inc.
Defendant: BluePrint Coffee, LLC
Case Number: 4:2016cv01758
Filed: November 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge: Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Blueprint Coffee LLC's motion to exclude the expert testimony and survey of Lisa Sheer (#67) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Hain BluePrint, Inc.'s motion for parti al summary judgment (#70) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Hain's motion will be GRANTED only as to BPC's affirmative defenses for laches and equitable estoppel. Those defenses are hereby STRICKEN. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/29/2018. (JMC)
March 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: This matter is before the Court on defendant Blueprint Coffee, LLC's, motion to amend the case management order (#52). The parties agree to three amendments, and the case management order will be amended as follows: Parag raph (I)(3)(c) of the case management order shall be amended to provide: Defendant must disclose all expert witnesses related to issues of liability and provide the reports required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) no later than February 22, 2018, and mus t make the expert witnesses available for depositions and have the depositions completed no later than March 22, 2018. Defendant must disclose all expert witnesses related to the issue of damages and provide the reports required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (a)(2) no later than May 29, 2018, and must make the expert witnesses available for depositions and have the depositions completed no later than June 12, 2018. Plaintiff must file any Daubert motion on defendant's damages expert by June 26, 201 8. Both Plaintiff and Defendant are required to produce the damages expert's file materials, subject to any claims of privilege reflected on a privilege log, concurrently with the expert's report. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to amend the case management order is GRANTED as explained above. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/19/2018. (JMC)
January 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion for leave to amend its answer (#41) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/5/2018. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hain BluePrint, Inc. v. BluePrint Coffee, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hain BluePrint, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan G. Musch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BluePrint Coffee, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?