Combs v. USA
Petitioner: Walter Combs
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 4:2016cv01799
Filed: November 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: John A. Ross
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Walter Combs to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/31/17. (JAB)
December 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant must either consent in writing to reclassification of his motion to appoint counsel as a motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, or he must withdraw the motion. Movant has twenty-one (21) days to comply with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant consents to the reclassification, he must file a second amended motion on the Court's form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to send movant a § 2255 form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant does not comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/14/16. (JAB)(Remark: Order and form mailed to movant)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?