Missouri Primate Foundation et al v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Missouri Primate Foundation, Connie Braun Casey, Andrew Sawyer, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and Angela Scott
Case Number: 4:2016cv02163
Filed: December 30, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 386 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counterclaim Plaintiffs Angela Scott and PETA's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Incurred to Obtain Compliance with the Consent Decree 365 and Motion to Supplement Motion for Attorneys&# 039; Fees and Costs Incurred to Obtain Compliance with the Consent Decree 379 are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Haddix must pay PETA $49,062.90 inexpenses and $175,341.34 in attorneys' fees within 7 days of the entry of this or der. If Haddix cannot pay all costs and fees within that time, she must post a bond for the full amount of the award within 7 days of the entry of this Order and pay the full amount of the award within 30 days of the Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/27/2023. (KEK)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 269 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counterclaim Plaintiff PETA's Motion for Sanctions [ECF 258 ] is granted and Tonia Haddix will not be allowed to present any evidence, whether at trial or in motion practice, in support of her affirmative defenses numbered 1 through 12. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counterclaim Plaintiff PETA's Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery [ECF 254 ] is granted; within fourteen (14) days of today, Tonia Haddix must supplement her response t o document requests and must produce all documents responsive to requests 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 13 and 19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counterclaim Defendant Tonia Haddix's Motion for Telephone Conference is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counterclaim Defendant Tonia Haddix's Request for Clarification [ECF 266 ] is granted only to the extent clarified above and denied as to her request for a hearing. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 8/24/2020. (NEP)
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 225 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Casey's Motion to Dismiss [ECF 191 ] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Casey's Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record on her Motion to Dismiss 214 is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PETA's Motion for Reconsideration [ECF 184 ] is granted only as to the Court's Order Denying the Joinder of Tonia Haddix, and is denied as to the Court's Order Dissolving the Temporary Restraining Order, as set forth herein. [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS] (Joint Status Report due by 5/1/2020.) Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/9/2020. (TMT)
November 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 132 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence 66 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment as to Missouri Primate Foundation and Connie Braun Casey 68 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Compel Inspection of Joey or in the Alternative for Default Judgment 83 is denied except that the adverse inferences listed above will be drawn from Sawyer's assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Compel Discovery from Connie Braun Casey 88 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Second Motion to Compel Discovery from Casey 92 is denied as to Requests Nos. 1 through 14 and is granted as to Requests No. 15 through 28 and 37. Casey shall supplement her answers to Requests Nos. 15 through 28 and 37 within twenty-one days of the date of this order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/26/18. (EAB)
March 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counterclaim defendants' motion to dismiss 29 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counterclaim defendants' motion to strike 27 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this case is currently stayed so counterclaim defendants may obtain new counsel, they are granted additional time, up to and including June 4, 2018 in which to file their answers to the counterclaim. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 3/22/2018. (CBL)
September 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss 11 is GRANTED as to Counts I, II and III of plaintiffs' complaint. Defendants' counterclaim remains pending before the Court. I will rule on plaintiffs' motion to dismiss defendants' counterclaim in a later order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 9/21/2017. (CBL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Missouri Primate Foundation et al v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Missouri Primate Foundation
Represented By: Kurtis B. Reeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connie Braun Casey
Represented By: Kurtis B. Reeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Sawyer
Represented By: Kurtis B. Reeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 1
Represented By: Kurtis B. Reeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 2
Represented By: Kurtis B. Reeg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Represented By: Marissa Lauren Curran
Represented By: James P. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angela Scott
Represented By: Marissa Lauren Curran
Represented By: James P. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?