De La Hunt v. Villmer
| De La Hunt |
| Villmer |
| Matthew De La Hunt |
| Tom Villmer |
| 4:2016cv02171 |
| December 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Nannette A Baker |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 REPLY to Response to Motion re #23 MOTION to Alter Judgment or Amend Judgment Under Rule 59(e) filed by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Schriener, Kevin) |
| Filing 26 RESPONSE in Opposition re #23 MOTION to Alter Judgment or Amend Judgment Under Rule 59(e) filed by Respondent Tom Villmer. (Spillane, Michael) |
Filing 25
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent must file a response to Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment [Doc. 23] no later than November 15, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on October 29, 2021. (JMR)
|
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #23 MOTION to Alter Judgment or Amend Judgment Under Rule 59(e) filed by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Schriener, Kevin) |
| Filing 23 MOTION to Alter Judgment or Amend Judgment Under Rule 59(e) by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Schriener, Kevin) |
|
Filing 22
JUDGMENT. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 09/30/21. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED. (Doc #10 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated herein, any motion by Petitioner for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. A separate judgment in accord with this Order is entered on the same date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 9/30/21. (EAB)
|
| NOTICE: IF YOU HAVE ALREADY UPGRADED YOUR PACER ACCOUNT YOU CAN DISREGARD THIS NOTICE. IF YOU DO NOT UPGRADE YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO FILE IN THE SYSTEM AFTER MAY 31, 2019. PLEASE UPGRADE IMMEDIATELY. If you are using a shared account to file cases, you will need to create an individual account; instructions can be found at:#https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/sites/moed/files/Register-for-New-PACER-account.pdf. If you already have an individual account, it will need to be upgraded; instructions can be found #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov/sites/moed/files/Upgrade-Current-PACER-Account.pdf. If you need further assistance contact the MOED CM/ECF Help Desk at 314-244-7650 or #moedml_cmecf_help@moed.uscourts.gov. (CSAW) |
|
Filing 20
Docket Text ORDER: Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Richard A. Saliterman for Petitioner (Doc. No. 19) is ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on November 28, 2017. (HEH)
|
| Filing 19 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Richard A. Saliterman. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number 0865-6256729) by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit)(Saliterman, Richard) |
| Filing 18 TRAVERSE re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0865-5743679.) filed by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Schriener, Kevin) |
|
Filing 17
Docket Text ORDER: Petitioner's Motion for an Extension of Time to File Reply until November 24, 2017, is ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on November 21, 2017. (HEH)
|
| Filing 16 Third MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Schriener, Kevin) |
|
Filing 15
Docket Text ORDER: Petitioner's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply [Doc. 14] ; ORDERED GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his reply no later than November 20, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on November 7, 2017. (HEH)
|
| Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Schriener, Kevin) |
|
Filing 13
Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply is GRANTED. [Doc. 12.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit his Reply Brief no later than November 6, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on October 6, 2017. (EMM)
|
| Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Schriener, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE To Amended Petition by Respondent Tom Villmer. (Spillane, Michael) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED PETITION against defendant Tom Villmer Amendment to #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0865-5743679.), filed by Matthew De La Hunt. Related document: #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0865-5743679.) filed by Matthew De La Hunt. (Attachments: #1 A, #2 B, #3 D, #4 E, #5 F, #6 G, #7 H, #8 J, #9 K)(CLA) |
|
Filing 9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Motion for Leave to File an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. [Doc. 7.]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file the response to Petitioners First Amended Petition no later than August 7, 2017. Petitioner shall file any Reply Brief no later than October 6, 2017. #7 ( Response to Court due by 8/7/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 6/6/17. (CLA)
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL re #7 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Habeas Petition by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit C Baugh Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Exhibit I De La Hunt Affidavit)(Schriener, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Habeas Petition by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Habeas Petition, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to be filed as an attachment to proposed habeas petition, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to be filed as an attachment, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D to be filed as an attachment to amended habeas petition, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E to be filed as an attachment to amended habeas petition, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F to be filed as an attachment to amended habeas petition, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G to be filed as a attachment to proposed habeas petition, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H to be filed as an attachment to habeas petition, #9 Exhibit Exhibit J to be filed as an attachment to habeas petition, #10 Exhibit Exhibit K to be filed as an attachment to habeas petition)(Schriener, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Respondent Tom Villmer filed by Respondent Tom Villmer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Transcript Pt. 1, #2 Exhibit 2 - Transcript Pt. 2, #3 Exhibit 3 - Legal File, #4 Exhibit 4 - Appellant's Brief, #5 Exhibit 5 - Respondent's Brief, #6 Exhibit 6 - Appellant's Reply Brief, #7 Exhibit 7 - Decision & Mandate, #8 Exhibit 8 - Docket Sheet, #9 Exhibit 9 - PCR Legal File, #10 Exhibit 10 - Supp Legal File, #11 Exhibit 11 - Appellant's Brief, #12 Exhibit 12 - State's Brief, #13 Exhibit 13 - Appellant's Reply Brief, #14 Exhibit 14 - Decision & Mandate, #15 Exhibit 15 - Docket Sheet, #16 Exhibit 16 - Face Sheet)(Spillane, Michael) |
| Filing 5 FULL CONSENT has been received by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt, Respondent Tom Villmer. (KJS) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Michael J. Spillane for Respondent Tom Villmer. (Spillane, Michael) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (KJS) |
|
Filing 3
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TRACK 4: 2254 HABEAS CORPUS PETITION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case has been randomly assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge. The parties have twenty-one (21) days from their entry of appearance to file their Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction forms. Respondent must show cause, in writing and within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, why the relief requested in the instant petition should not be granted. In accordance with Rule 5(b) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, Respondent's answer must address the merits of all grounds for relief alleged in the petition. In addition, it must state whether any ground in the petition is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, non retroactivity, or a statute of limitations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner chooses to file a reply to Respondent's answer to the petition, the reply must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date the answer to the petition is filed. If Petitioner fails to timely file a reply, the right to file such a reply must be waived. See Rule (e) of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 1/4/2017. Show Cause Response due by 2/17/2017.(GGB)
|
| Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401. (CSAW) |
| Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: Honorable Nannette A. Baker. (MFG) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0865-5743679.) by Petitioner Matthew De La Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit Herriot, #2 Exhibit Affidavit Hakes, #3 Exhibit Affidavit Baugh, #4 Exhibit Affidavit Isom, #5 Exhibit Affidavit Peden, #6 Exhibit Affidavit Bonney, #7 Exhibit Character Letters, #8 Exhibit Affidavit Gainor, #9 Exhibit Affidavit De La Hunt)(Schriener, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
