Cotton v. Saint Louis University
| Debora M. Cotton |
| Saint Louis University |
| 4:2017cv00211 |
| January 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Audrey G Fleissig |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/31/2017. (NEB)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's lawsuit is DISMISSED due to her failure to properly exhaust her administrative remedies and file her claims within ninety (90) days of receipt of her EEOC right-to-sue letter. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/31/2017. (NEB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6,7. Fri Mar 31 08:43:11 CDT 2017 (Blasko, Nicole)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [#2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, in writing and no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, why this case should not be dismissed as time-barred. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 2/13/2017. (NEB)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 5. Mon Feb 13 13:22:02 CST 2017 (Blasko, Nicole)
|
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jan 17 11:01:18 CST 2017 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MFG) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig. (MFG) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Debora M. Cotton. (MFG) |
| Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Plaintiff Debora M. Cotton. (MFG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Debora M. Cotton. (MFG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Saint Louis University Jury Demand,, filed by Debora M. Cotton. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Right to Sue Charging Letter, #2 Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Original Filing Form)(MFG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cotton v. Saint Louis University | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Debora M. Cotton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Saint Louis University | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
