Watson v. St. Louis City Justice Center

Petitioner: Bruce L. Watson
Respondent: St. Louis City Justice Center
Case Number: 4:2017cv00961
Filed: March 13, 2017
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: Noelle C. Collins
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 13, 2017 3 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will be granted.An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 4/13/17. (CLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watson v. St. Louis City Justice Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bruce L. Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: St. Louis City Justice Center
Represented By: Kimberly M. Gardner(Designation State / Local Government)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?