Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC v. Ryco Enterprises, LLC et al
Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC |
Ryco Enterprises, LLC, Jason Church doing business as Music Works Entertainment and Ryco Enterprises, LLC doing business as Leo's Pub & Grill |
4:2017cv01306 |
April 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Within US but Outside District |
Ronnie L White |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 FINAL REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding trademark (BRP) |
Filing 26 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the claims of Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC against Ryco Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Leo's Pub & Grill and Jason Church d/b/a Music Works Entertainment are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on February 2, 2018. (BRP) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Jason Church's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF No. #17 ) and Ryco Enterprises, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. #18 ) are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ryco Enterprises, LLC's Motion to Dismiss the original complaint (ECF No. 13) is DENIED as MOOT. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on February 2, 2018. (BRP) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM re #23 Notice (Other) Response to Notice of Additional Authority by Plaintiff Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 23 NOTICE Supplemental Authority: by Defendants Jason Church, Ryco Enterprises, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - D. Minn's Order in Phoenix v. Star Music, et al.)(Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion re #18 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Ryco Enterprises, LLC. (Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 21 REPLY to Response to Motion re #17 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Jason Church. (Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #18 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiff Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Response in Opposition)(Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Ryco Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion)(Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Jason Church. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion)(Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 16 ENTRY of Appearance by Jonathan L.A. Phillips for Defendant Jason Church. (Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 15 REDACTION First Amended Complaint 14 by Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Defendant Ryco Enterprises, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion)(Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 12 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Defendant Ryco Enterprises, LLC [ECF No. 11] is GRANTED to and including May 25, 2017. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 5/16/17. (ALM) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or otherwise Respond to the Same by Defendant Ryco Enterprises, LLC. (Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 ENTRY of Appearance by Jonathan L.A. Phillips for Defendant Ryco Enterprises, LLC. (Phillips, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 Docket Text ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Jason Church's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint [ECF No. 8] is GRANTED to and including June 9, 2017. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 5/11/17. (ALM) |
Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Jason Church. (Borowiak, Zachary) |
Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by Zachary J. Borowiak for Defendant Jason Church. (Borowiak, Zachary) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC. Jason Church served on 4/19/2017, answer due 5/10/2017. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC. Ryco Enterprises, LLC served on 4/15/2017, answer due 5/8/2017. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 4 REPORT to Commissioner of filing or determination of an action regarding trademark. (BAK) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Plaintiff Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC. Parent companies: none, Subsidiaries: none, Publicly held company: none,. (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC Process Server: Process Server St. Louis (Vogt, Keith) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number 0865-5907585, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Phoenix Entertainment Partners, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet , #2 Original Filing Form , #3 Summons as to Defendant, Ryco Enterprises, LLC, #4 Summons as to Defendant, Jason Church)(Vogt, Keith) |
Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons was emailed to attorney Keith A. Vogt. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Direct-Assigned: U.S. District Judge Ronnie L. White. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.