Windham v. St. Louis County Circuit Court et al
| J. L. Windham |
| St. Louis County Circuit Court, St. Louis County Prosecutors Office, St. Louis County Police Department, Ryan Blay, Christopher Ormerod and Michelle Otti |
| 4:2017cv01381 |
| April 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Within US but Outside District |
| E. Richard Webber |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is subject to DISMISSAL because it is barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #4] is DENIED AS MOOT. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on September 29, 2017. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff must show cause why th is action should not be dismissed. If plaintiff does not comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. ( Show Cause Response due by 9/12/2017.) Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on August 22, 2017. (MCB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
