Vellmer v. St. Louis County Department of Justice Services et al
Ricky Joseph Vellmer |
St. Louis County Department of Justice Services and Herbert Bernsen |
4:2017cv01451 |
May 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Henry Edward Autrey |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no filing fee will be assessed at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. # 6 ] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail to plaintiff a copy of the Courts prisoner civil rights complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amend ed complaint on the Courts form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed for non- compl iance with this Order, the dismissal will not count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).( (Amended Complaint due by 9/3/2017.) (Court's prisoner civil rights complaint form attached to this order and mailed to the petitioner this day.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/4/17. (KJS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.