Wilson v. Cauldwell et al
||Reginald D. Wilson
||Unknown Cauldwell and Unknown City/State Actors
||May 3, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - City
||Henry Edward Autrey
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 29, 2017
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docke t No. 2 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 5 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/29/17. (KJS)
|July 12, 2017
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2 ) is HELD IN ABEYANCE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order, p laintiff shall submit an amended complaint on a court- provided form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Courts Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form. (Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 8/2/2017.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/12/17. (**Instructions and a Copy of the Court's Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint Form attached to this Order and sent to the petitioner.**)(KJS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?