Monroe v. Trump et al
| William Monroe, Jr. |
| Donald J. Trump, Thomas Price, Department of Health and Human Services Program Support Center, Elisabeth DeVoss, John Tillery, Kevin D. Rothmier, Department of Health & Human Services and Ben Carson |
| 4:2017cv01462 |
| May 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Patricia L. Cohen |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2005 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff William Monroe, Jr.'s motion to proceed in forma pauperis brought on behalf of him [Doc. # 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Harriet Tubman, Inc.'s motion to proc eed in forma pauperis brought by William Monroe, Jr. on behalf of the corporation [Doc. # 2 ] is DENIED as a corporation cannot proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is subject to dismissal because a corporation cannot p roceed pro se and plaintiff William Monroe, Jr. does not have standing to bring the present action on his own behalf under the McKinney-Vento Act. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions are DENIED AS MOOT. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 6/7/17. (KXS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
