Foxx v. State of Missouri - County Prosecutor 4:2017cv01470 | US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Foxx v. State of Missouri - County Prosecutor

Foxx v. State of Missouri - County Prosecutor

Petitioner:	Frederick James Foxx
Respondent:	State of Missouri - County Prosecutor
Case Number:	4:2017cv01470
Filed:	May 8, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Patricia L. Cohen
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 27, 2017	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to appoint counsel (Docket No. 3 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 12/27/17. (EAB)
November 16, 2017	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no order to show cause directed to Respondent shall issue at this time beca use it appears the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this habeas proceeding. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days after the date of this Memorandum and Order, Petitioner may file material showing cause why the Court should not dismiss this proceeding due to the Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court will dismiss this habeas proceeding without prejudice and without further notice if Petitioner fails either (1) to comply in a timely manner with this Memorandum and Order or (2) to demonstrate that this Court may exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this habeas proceeding. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 11/16/2017. (CBL)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 27, 2017

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to appoint counsel (Docket No. 3 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 12/27/17. (EAB)

November 16, 2017

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no order to show cause directed to Respondent shall issue at this time beca use it appears the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this habeas proceeding. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days after the date of this Memorandum and Order, Petitioner may file material showing cause why the Court should not dismiss this proceeding due to the Court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court will dismiss this habeas proceeding without prejudice and without further notice if Petitioner fails either (1) to comply in a timely manner with this Memorandum and Order or (2) to demonstrate that this Court may exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this habeas proceeding. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 11/16/2017. (CBL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foxx v. State of Missouri - County Prosecutor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Frederick James Foxx
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: State of Missouri - County Prosecutor
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?