Sauceda v. USA
||May 15, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - City
||Henry Edward Autrey
|Nature of Suit:
||Motions to Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 29, 2017
NUNC PRO TUNC OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant=s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing ' 2255 Proceedings.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a Certificate of Appealability. See 28 U.S.C. ' 2253. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 11/29/17. (CLA)
|October 27, 2017
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant=s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing ' 2255 Proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a Certificate of Appealability. See 28 U.S.C. ' 2253. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 10/27/17. (JAB)
|July 12, 2017
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant must show cause, no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant does not comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further proceedings. (Show Cause Response due by 8/2/2017.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 7/12/17. (KJS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?