Burdess et al v. Cottrell, Inc.
| Gregory Lynn Burdess and Lisa Burdess |
| Cottrell, Inc. |
| 4:2017cv01515 |
| May 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Lincoln |
| John A. Ross |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
207
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Cottrell's Motion to Bar Dr. Gonzalez, ECF No. 176 , is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as stated herein. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 2/29/24. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
171
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's Count V for punitive damages is DENIED. (Doc. 137 ). Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 9/5/2023. (LNJ)
|
|
Filing
166
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Doc. 133 ). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/10/23. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
165
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell's motions to exclude the testimony of Drs. Emanuel, Larkin, and Rotman are DENIED. (Doc. 139 , 140 , 141 ). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/3/2023. (LNJ)
|
|
Filing
164
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell's motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Gerald Micklow is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (Doc. 142 ). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/20/23. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell's motion for summary judgment on grounds of judicial estoppel is DENIED. (Doc. 135 ). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/22/2023. (CLT)
|
|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell's Motion for Bill of Costs (Doc. 117 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall tax costs against Plaintiffs and in favor of Cottrell in the amount of $4,618.60. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that execution of this modified Bill of Costs shall be STAYED pending the outcome of Plaintiffs' appeal. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/25/22. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment on Missouri's Borrowing Statute and Statute of Limitations (Doc. 66 ) is GRANTED. A separate Order of Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions in this case (Docs. 61 , 62 , 64 , 68 , 70 - 74 , 114 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/8/2021. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell, Inc.'s ("Cottrell") Combined Motion to Reconsider or Certify Immediate Interlocutory Appeal (Doc. 22 ), is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/9/19. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 5 ), is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/16/2018. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Cottrell, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) 5 is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Rule 16 conference will be set by separate Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/30/2018. (CLO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
