Brown et al v. Blakeney et al
Plaintiff: Roslyn Brown and R. Z.
Defendant: Steven Blakeney, Pine Lawn, Missouri, City of, Lawrence Flemming, Brian Britton, Felicia Shelton, Steven Lowman and Raymond Winston
Case Number: 4:2017cv01542
Filed: May 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 79 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss Felicia Shelton 74 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Shelton is dismissed from the § 1983 conspiracy claim of both Plaintiffs and the IIED claim of R.Z . She is not dismissed from the § 1983 claim of unlawful seizure of Ms. Brown, the § 1983 claim of unlawful search of Ms. Brown, the § 1983 claim of unlawful seizure of R.Z., the § 1983 malicious prosecution claim of both Plaintiffs, the NIED claim of R.Z., the false imprisonment claim of R.Z., and the abuse of process claim of Ms. Brown. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 5/8/2018. (CBL)
February 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order)IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss Party Defendants City of Pine Lawn, Fleming, Britton, Lowman, and Winston 18 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss Party Defendants Fleming, Lowman, and Winston 31 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants Fleming, Lowman, and Winston are dismissed from the § 1983 claim of unlawful seizure of Ms. Brown, the § 1983 conspiracy claim of both Plaintiffs, and the IIED cl aim of R.Z. Defendants Fleming, Lowman, and Winston are not dismissed from the § 1983 claim of unlawful search of Ms. Brown, the § 1983 claim of unlawful seizure of R.Z., the § 1983 malicious prosecution claim of both Plaintiffs, th e NIED claim of R.Z., the false imprisonment claim of R.Z., and the abuse of process claim of Ms. Brown. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss Party Defendant Blakeney 44 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant Blakeney is dismiss ed from the § 1983 conspiracy claim of both Plaintiffs, and the IIED claim of R.Z. Defendant Blakeney is not dismissed from the § 1983 claim of unlawful seizure of Ms. Brown, the § 1983 claim of unlawful search of Ms. Brown, the  67; 1983 claim of unlawful seizure of R.Z., the § 1983 malicious prosecution claim of both Plaintiffs, the NIED claim of R.Z., the false imprisonment claim of R.Z., and the abuse of process claim of Ms. Brown. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 2/20/18. (EAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown et al v. Blakeney et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roslyn Brown
Represented By: Nathaniel Richard Carroll
Represented By: Blake Alexander Strode
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. Z.
Represented By: Nathaniel Richard Carroll
Represented By: Blake Alexander Strode
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Blakeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pine Lawn, Missouri, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence Flemming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Britton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Felicia Shelton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Lowman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond Winston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?