Ursch v. Cabela's Incorporated et al
| Jeffery C. Ursch |
| Cabela's Incorporated and Cabela's Retail MO, LLC |
| 4:2017cv01623 |
| June 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| John M. Bodenhausen |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation of Plaintiff and Defendants Cabelas Incorporated and Cabelas Retail MO, LLC, Referring this Matter to Arbitration and Requesting a Stay Pending Completion of Arbitration (ECF. No. 9 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is stayed pending completion of arbitration. All pending motions are denied as moot and may be refiled, as necessary, following the conclusion of arbitration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the August 23, 2017, Rule 16 Conference is vacated and will be reset, as necessary, following the conclusion of arbitration. The parties also are excused from filing their Joint Scheduling Plan due on August 16, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties sha ll file a notice with the Court within ten days of the conclusion of arbitration. If the arbitration is not concluded by February 9, 2018, the parties must file a joint report on that date setting forth the status of the arbitration. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Bodenhausen on 8/9/17. (ARL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
