Mecey et al v. Farmington, City of et al
| Robin Mecey and David Mecey |
| Farmington, City of, Farmington Municipal Police Department, Gregory Beavers, Edward Pultz, Susie Miller, Ryan Miller, Eric Spiker, Clifford Bone, Teresa Bohn, JC Penney, Summer Taylor, Marie Jirik, Victoria Bollman, Damien Craft and Jerrod Mahurin |
| 4:2017cv01653 |
| June 12, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Francois |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Edward Pultzs Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, For More Definite Statement and To Strike Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF 27) is GRANTED, as to the Motion to Dismiss; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against Defendant Edward Pultz in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF 23 ) are DISMISSED, and that Defendant Edward Pultz is terminated as a Defendant in this case. Edward Pultz terminated. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 11/30/17. (JAB)
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., and Victoria Bollmans Motion to Dismiss, For More Definite Statement and/or to Strike Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF 25) is GRANTED, as to the Motion to Dismiss; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against Defendants J.C. Penney and Victoria Bollman in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF 23) are DISMISSED, and that Defendants J.C. Penney and Victoria Bollman are terminated as Defendants in this case. 25 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 11/22/17. (CLA)
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint Second Amended Complaint is DENIED (ECF 33), without prejudice;IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after the Court rules on J.C. Penneys and Bollmans Motion to Dismi ss, For More Definite Statement, and/or to Strike Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF 25) and Pultzs Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, For More Definite Statement and to Strike Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF 27), Plaintiffs may r enew their Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint Second Amended Complaint;IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Out of Time (ECF 35) is GRANTED; that Plaintiffs have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a Response to Pultzs Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, For More Definite Statement and to Strike Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF 27); that no further extensions will be granted; and that Plaintiffs failure to file a Response within seven (7) da ys may result in the granting of Pultzs Motion; andIT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendant Edward Pultz has seven (7) days from the date Plaintiffs file a Response to file a Reply. 33 35 ( Response to Court due by 11/21/2017.) Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 11/14/17. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.