St. Louis Labor Healthcare Network et al v. Louis Maull Company
| St. Louis Labor Healthcare Network, Dave Lalumondier, Pat Raftery, Rodney Kalina, Don Schaper, Bryan Murphy, Mike Schlueter, Merle Lemmen and Abbie Otten |
| Louis Maull Company |
| 4:2017cv01917 |
| July 6, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| David D. Noce |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for contempt (Doc. 16 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs request for an award of the fees and costs incurred in bringing their motions to compel and for cont empt (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED. Defendant and Mr. Louis Maull V must forthwith pay to plaintiffs the sum of $1,601.00 as reasonable attorneys' fees for the filing and prosecution of plaintiffs' motions to compel and for contempt. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 6/8/18. (JAB)
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion to continue the deposition (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED in that a corporate designee must appear for post-judgment deposition at a mutually agreeable date and time not later than January 1 5, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to compel (Doc. 13 ) is GRANTED in part in that defendant must produce to plaintiffs' counsel, not later than December 30, 2017, any as yet unproduced documents relating directly to the d efendant company, as set forth in the Amended Notice of Rule 69 Deposition and Request for Production of Documents (Doc. 14-4, Pls. Ex. 3). In all other respects the motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 12/15/17. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.