Watkins v. Walgreens et al
| Chauncey Leon Watkins |
| Brentwood Police Department, St. Louis County Circuit Courts and Public Defender System |
| 4:2017cv02041 |
| July 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Nannette A. Baker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff is not responsible for paying an initial partial filing fee in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). An Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 8/31/17. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall detach Docket Number 6 from the present action and reinstate the original complaint in this action. All defendants named in the original complaint shall be reinstated as defendants in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Docket Number 6 shall be filed as a separate original civil action, with a filing date of August 9, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 8/24/17. (cc: Case Opening) (KJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
