Watson v. Boyd et al
Plaintiff: Fred Watson
Defendant: Eddie Boyd, III and Ferguson, Missouri, City of
Case Number: 4:2017cv02187
Filed: July 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Within US but Outside District
Presiding Judge: Ronnie L. White
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 158 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 128 ) is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff� 39;s Malicious Prosecution claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 and the Monell Failure to Train claim. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Summary Judgment Submission (ECF No. 140 ) is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part, as outlined above. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on March 17, 2020. (BRP)
May 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Re-Open Discovery for Limited Purposes and for a Third Amended Case Management Order (ECF No. 116 ) and PlaintiffsSecond Motion for Extension (ECF No. 117 ) are GRANTED, in part. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Joint Status Report (ECF No. 119 ) is ADOPTED by the Court. The parties agree that the following schedule shall apply [SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS]. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 05/03/2019. (KCB)
April 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 115 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification (ECF No. 112 ) is DENIED. The Court holds that Defendant City of Ferguson is in compliance with this Court's April 5th Memorandum and Order with respect to Plaintiffs Requests for Admissions. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 4/19/2019. (AFC)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending the Resolution of Motions Before the Court, or in the Alternative, Motion for Amended Scheduling Order (ECF No. 74 ) and Plaintiff's 56(D) Motion to Dismiss or Defer Summary Judgment (ECF No. 103 ) are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 4/9/2019. (AFC)
April 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 109 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Fred Watson's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 54 ) is DENIED, in part, and GRANTED, in part as outlined above. Defendants shall supplement their responses within ten (10) days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Fred Watson's Motion for Protective Order or, In the Alternative, Motion to Compel (ECF No. 56 ) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as outlined above. Defendants shall supplement their responses within ten (10) days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City of Ferguson, Missouri's Motion to Bifurcate Claims and to Stay Discovery and Trial (ECF No. 65 ) and Defendant Eddie Boyd's Motion to Join In and Adopt Defendant City of Ferguson's Moti on to Bifurcate Claims and to Stay Discovery and Trial (ECF No. 71 ) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Quash Subpoena (ECF No. 81 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery of Previousl y Taken Depositions (ECF No. 87 ) is DENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Admitted Plaintiffs Request for Admissions Directed to Defendant City of Ferguson (ECF No. 89 ) is GRANTED, in part. Defendant City of Ferguson is ordered to respond to the Requests for Admissions within ten (10) days. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 04/05/2019. (KCB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watson v. Boyd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred Watson
Represented By: Nathaniel Richard Carroll
Represented By: Blake Alexander Strode
Represented By: Michael-John Voss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eddie Boyd, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ferguson, Missouri, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?