The Revolution FMO, LLC v. Mitchell
The Revolution FMO, LLC |
Marvin Mitchell |
4:2017cv02220 |
August 7, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Henry Edward Autrey |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1836 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 40] is GRANTED as to Count I and DENIED as to Counts II, III, and IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is given 14 days from the date of this order to file an Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for a More Definite Statement is denied. 40 . Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 5/10/18. (CLA) |
Filing 35 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Renewed Emergency Motion for a temporary restraining order [ECF Doc. No. 22 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 7 days from the date of this Opinion, Memorandum and Ord er, the parties shall meet and reduce to writing the agreed terms and conditions of a Protective Order for the Courts consideration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit, on or before, September 12, 2017 a Proposed Protective Order for the Courts consideration ( Response to Court Re: Proposed Protective Order due by 9/12/2017.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/29/17. (KJS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.