Burns v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
Plaintiff: Michael Burns
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections, Timothy Seabaugh, Chris Skaggs, Johnny Williams, John Doe and Jane Doe
Case Number: 4:2017cv02304
Filed: August 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Melanie Hinkle, Defendant Susan Price, Defendant Chris Skaggs, Defendant Johnny Williams, Defendant Timothy Seabaugh. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment (#37) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/30/19. (CSG)
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 33 MOTION to Compel filed by Plaintiff Michael Burns. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/28/19. (CSG)
May 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 13 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Missouri Department of Corrections. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs official capacity claims for monetary damages against defendants Timothy Seabaugh, Chris Ska ggs, Johnny Williams, Melanie Hinkle, and Susan Price are DISMISSED. A separate order of partial dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Missouri Department of Corrections' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 13) is DENIED a s moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the amended complaint, pursuant to the service agreement the Court maintains with the Missouri Attorney General's Office, as to defendants Timothy Seabaugh, Chris Skaggs, Johnny Williams, Melanie Hinkle, and Susan Price. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/14/18. (CSG)
November 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.33 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) the statement t hat the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Timothy Seabaugh, Chris Skaggs, Johnny Williams, John Doe, and Ms. Jane Doe are DISMISSED from this action. A separate order ofdismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this partial dismissal would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to serve process upon the complaint, pursuant to the service agreement this Court maintains with the Office of the Missouri Attorney General, as to defendant Missouri Department of Corrections. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 12/7/2017.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 11/16/2017. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burns v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Seabaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Skaggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnny Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?