Arman v. Davis et al
Plaintiff: Andrew Arman
Defendant: Jason Davis, Ham Payne Fum, Cindy Griffith and Alan Earls
Case Number: 4:2017cv02360
Filed: September 1, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Jason Davis, Cindy Griffith, and Alan Earls' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 52] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Seventh and Eighth Motions to Appoint Counsel are DENIED as MOOT. [Docs. 62, 64]. An appropriate order of dismissal and judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/24/2019. (MRC)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Jason Davis, Cindy Griffith, and Alan Earls' motion for leave to amend answer out of time (Doc. 49 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall detach the attachment from Doc. 49, and file it as defendants Jason Davis, Cindy Griffith, and Alan Earls' Amended Answer to plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/10/19. (JWD)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's third motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 34]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/7/2018. (MRC)
July 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [Doc. 22]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/2/2018. (MRC)
May 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Jason Davis, Cindy Griffith, and Alan Earls is DENIED. [Doc. 17] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Jason Davis, Cindy Griffith, and Alan Earls shall file an answer to the First Amended Complaint no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. ( Response to Court due by 6/15/2018.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 5/16/2018. (MRC)
December 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that the Clerk of Court shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the amended complaint, pursuant to the service agreement the Court maintains with the Missouri Attorney General' s Office, as to Jason Davis, Cindy Griffith, and Alan Earls in their individual capacities. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in their individual capacities, defendants Jason Davis, Cindy Griffith, and Alan Earls shall reply to the amended compla int within the time provided by the applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's due process, deliberate indifference, failure to protect, supervisory liability, and equal protect ion claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this partial dismissal would not be taken in good faith.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 12/18/17. (JWD)
September 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [Doc. 2] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 6]IT I S FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED. [Doc. 5] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.00....IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in accordance with the instructions set forth herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a blank Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form. Plaintiff may request additional forms as needed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, the Court will dismiss this action wi thout prejudice and without further notice as to all defendants except for defendant Jason Davis in his individual capacity. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely pay the initial filing fee of $1.00, the Court will di smiss this entire action without prejudice and without further notice for failure to comply with the Courts orders. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 10/20/2017., Response to Court due by 10/20/2017.). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/29/2017. (MRC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arman v. Davis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Arman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ham Payne Fum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cindy Griffith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alan Earls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?