Kulhanek v. Griffith et al
| Brandon Kulhanek |
| Cindy Griffith, Greg Dunn, Ian Wallace, Alan Earls, Eric Burch, Joe Arcand, William Milam, Travis Crews, Stan Payne, Jennifer Price, Bruce Dunn, Vincent Cain, Donald Walcott, Robert McMahan, Rick Menteer, Will Hunter, Unknown Batiste, Unknown Nichols, Unknown Declue, Unknown King, Unknown Klein, Unknown Sistry, Unknown Lee, Unknown Renshaw, Unknow Isgrig, Unknown Stegall, Unknown Hand, Jason Davis, Amber Rayfield, Kimberly Price, Christine Henson, Frederick Knapp, Patrick Brauner, Adam Randazzo, Michael Sandberg, Ryan Brooks and Jeffrey Jones |
| 4:2017cv02431 |
| September 18, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Washington |
| John A. Ross |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Cindy Griffith, Greg Dunn, Rick Menteer, and Will Hunter's Motion for Summary Judgement is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 53 ). A separate Judgement will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/27/2020. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to file sealed documents (Doc. No. 78 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' request (Doc. No. 80 ) to provide Plaintiff with a redacted version of the bed movement logs (found at Doc. No. 79 at Ex. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to stay summary judgment is DENIED. (Doc. No. 72 ). Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' summary judgment motion within thirty (30) days of this Order.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/16/20. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' request for an extension of two weeks to produce documents explaining why Plaintiff was placed in a camera cell is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants will be granted an extension of seven (7) days to either produce the outstanding documents or explain why those documents are irrelevant or should not be produced. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/6/2020. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for production of documents and camera footage (Doc. No. 74 ) is DENIED in part. The Court will not direct Defendants to produce: (1) any and all documents pertaining to secu rity orders starting on January 25, 2016, August 19, 2016, and February 21, 2017; (2) logs detailing the periodic reviews of Plaintiff's security orders; (3) search logs starting February 21, 2017 through November 31, 2017; or (4) any and all logs that claim Plaintiff was suicidal or required close-observation from February 21, 2017, through April 20, 2017. The Court will direct Defendants to either produce the bed movement logs from February 21, 2017 through April 20, 2017, the docu ments explaining why Plaintiff was placed in a camera cell, and the handheld and wing camera footage of Plaintiff being searched from February 21, 2017 through November 31, 2017, or respond as to why these materials should not be discoverable within seven (7) days of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 73 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/26/20. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 63 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide this Court with a response within fifteen (15) days of this order identifying what documents and video footage he asserts will support his claim, as well as a description of each items relevance to the case. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/30/20. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will convert Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 53 ) into a motion for summary judgment, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in light of the above, Defendants shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to file any supplemental briefing setting forth materials pertinent to their motion. Plaintiff shall have 30 days thereafter to file any supplemental response, and Defendants shall have 14 days thereafter to reply. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/26/2019. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defense counsel shall have ten (10) days to provide the Court with a response in writing as to whether the Missouri Attorney General's Office will waive service on behalf of Greg Dunn in accordanc e with the waiver of service agreement this Court maintains with the Missouri Attorney General's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if defense counsel is unable to waive service on behalf of defendant Greg Dunn, counsel shall provide under seal and ex parte, a notice to the Court indicating the reason counsel is unable to waive service as to defendant Greg Dunn. If defendant Dunn is no longer employed by the Missouri Department of Corrections, counsel will need to provide, under seal and ex parte, defendant Dunn's last known home address so that the Court can effectuate service of summons on defendant Dunn through the U.S. Marshal's Office.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/28/19. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' motion to dismiss this action [Doc. # 21 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. # 23 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsel shall provide the Court with a response within ten (10) days of the date of this Order as to whether the Missouri Attorney General's Office will waive service on behalf of defendan t Greg Dunn in accordance with the Waiver of Service Agreement this Court maintains with the Missouri Attorney General's Office as to Missouri Department of Corrections Employees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if defense counsel is unable to waiv e service on behalf of defendant Greg Dunn, counsel shall provide, under seal, and ex parte, a notice to the Court indicating the reason counsel is unable to accept the waiver of service as to defendant Greg Dunn. If defendant Dunn is no longer emp loyed by the Missouri Department of Corrections, counsel will need to provide, under seal and ex parte, defendant Dunn's last known home address so the Court can effectuate service of summons on defendant Dunn through the U.S. Marshal's Office.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for entry of default [Doc. # 12 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. # 24 ] is DENIED AT THIS TIME. Plaintiff has shown that he is able to repr esent his own interests at this time; and this case is not complex. The Court will allow plaintiff to renew his appointment of counsel if necessary at a later point in the case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion for extension of t ime to file a responsive pleading [Doc. # 20 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall file their Answer in this action within twenty-one days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/14/19. (JAB)(cc: Clerk of Court/Chief Deputy)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $2.91 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. This case is assigned to Track: 5. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/23/2018. (CLO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
