Harper v. Ascension Health Alliance et al
Plaintiff: Licia L. Harper
Defendant: Ascension Health Alliance, John and Jane Does 1 Through 100, John Doe Corporation 1 Through 10 and Other John Doe Entities 1 Through 10
Case Number: 4:2017cv02495
Filed: September 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Ascension Health Alliance's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement 20 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint no later than thirty days from the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Licia L. Harpers Motion for Entry of Default 22 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 12/15/2017. (CBL)
October 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Withdraw 10 . At the hearing on the motion held on October 16, 2017, at 11:00 a.m., the Court granted Plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff Licia Harper shall find new counsel, or inform the Court, in writing, she intends to proceed pro se, no later than November 16, 2017. Plaintiff shall immediately provide the Court with her contact information, including a telephone number at which she can be reached. If Plaintiff informs the Court she wishes to proceed pro se, the Court will arrange a telephone conference to speak with Plaintiff and defense counsel prior to proceeding with the case. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 10/16/17. (EAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harper v. Ascension Health Alliance et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Licia L. Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ascension Health Alliance
Represented By: Jessica L. Liss
Represented By: Daniel P. O'Donnell, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1 Through 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Corporation 1 Through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Other John Doe Entities 1 Through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?