Mize v. Robert J. Ambruster, Inc. et al
| Jeffrey M. Mize |
| Robert J. Ambruster, Inc. and St. Louis County Circuit Court |
| 4:2017cv02691 |
| November 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Within US but Outside District |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Mandamus and Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for "Leave to File Objections and Combined Motion for Judicial Reconsideration Redress Review for Transfer for Mandamus and Motion for Leave to Exceed the Requir ed Word County & Page Limit and Number of Copies" is DENIED. [Doc. 25] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's post-dismissal motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. [Doc. 26] < B>IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's post-dismissal motion to amend his petition is DENIED. [Doc. 26] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not accept any additional post-dismissal motions or pleadings from petitioner unless they relate to an appeal. Any such motions or pleadings shall be returned to petitioner forthwith with the exception of those dealing with appellate matters.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 1/7/2019. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's "Combined Motion for Leave to File Entry of Formal Objection and Motion for Reconsideration Review," construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is DENIED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as untimely. [Doc. 23] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/21/2018. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. [Doc. 3] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint b ecause this Court lacks jurisdiction over this matter and the complaint either fails to state a claim upon which relief shall be granted, or is legally frivolous, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot. [Docs. 5, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court certifies that an appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 2/7/2018. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
