Leeb v. Charter Communications, Inc.
| Greg Leeb |
| Charter Communications, Inc. |
| 4:2017cv02780 |
| November 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Within US but Outside District |
| Ronnie L. White |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Greg Leebs motion to compel entry of randomization protocol ( 134 ) is GRANTED. The parties shall proceed forward with the randomization process as further defined herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Charter Communications, Inc.s motion to clarify (138) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART commensurate with the instructions and conclusions made herein. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/30/19. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Greg Leeb's motion to compel discovery responses (ECF 80 ) is GRANTED. However, Charter's production will be limited in the following ways: (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) IT IS FURTHER O RDERED THAT Defendant Charter Communication, Inc.'s motion to compel discovery response (ECF 115 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Leeb's motion to compel discovery responses and for sanctions (ECF 120 ) is GRANTED. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 9/20/2019. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Greg Leeb's Unopposed Motion for Burke Law Offices, LLC to be Appointed Interim Class Counsel and Incorporated Memorandum in Support (ECF No. 78 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Burke Law Offices, LLC is appointed as interim lead class counsel. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 04/03/3019. (KCB)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF Nos. 43 , 45 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Requests for Production Nos. 1, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 19 is DENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel responses to Interrogatory No. 1 and Request for Production No. 2 is GRANTED as to the narrowed Interrogatory set forth in Plaintiffs reply brief (ECF No. 56 p. 1) and this Memorandum and Order, with any personal identifying information to be limited to names and cell phone numbers of recipients. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 1/9/2019. (AFC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Leeb v. Charter Communications, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Greg Leeb | |
| Represented By: | Nathan D. Sturycz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charter Communications, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew D. Guletz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
