Nash v. Griffith

Nash v. Griffith

Petitioner:	Dennis R. Nash
Respondent:	Cindy Griffith
Case Number:	4:2017cv02825
Filed:	December 4, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	John A. Ross
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 5, 2020	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Dennis R. Nash's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED. FURTHER the Court finds that, because Petitioner cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 834 (1998). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/5/2020. (SMM)
December 7, 2017	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Dennis R. Nashs motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 3 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/7/17. (JAB)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 5, 2020

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Dennis R. Nash's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED. FURTHER the Court finds that, because Petitioner cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 834 (1998). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/5/2020. (SMM)

December 7, 2017

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner Dennis R. Nashs motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 3 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/7/17. (JAB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nash v. Griffith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dennis R. Nash
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Cindy Griffith
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke(Designation State / Local Government)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?