County of San Mateo, California et al v. Peabody Energy Corp.
Debtor: Peabody Energy Corp.
Appellant: County of San Mateo, California, City of Imperial Beach, California and County of Marin, California
Appellee: Peabody Energy Corp.
Trustee: Office of U.S. Trustee
Case Number: 4:2017cv02886
Filed: December 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: I find that the bankruptcy court's determination that Appellants' First Causes of Action were claims was correct as a matter of law. I further find that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in ruling tha t Appellants remaining pre-petition or pre-Effective Date claims were discharged. As a result, the bankruptcy court's order enjoining Appellants from prosecuting the PEC causes of action and directing that Appellants promptly dismiss the PEC causes of action with prejudice is affirmed. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 3/29/19. (ARL)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellants motion to for a stay pending appeal 4 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 9/20/18. (KJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: County of San Mateo, California et al v. Peabody Energy Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: Peabody Energy Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: County of San Mateo, California
Represented By: Matthew E. McClintock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: City of Imperial Beach, California
Represented By: Matthew E. McClintock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: County of Marin, California
Represented By: Matthew E. McClintock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Peabody Energy Corp.
Represented By: Matthew Curtis Corcoran
Represented By: Steven N. Cousins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Trustee: Office of U.S. Trustee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?