Johnson v. Special School District of St. Louis County et al
| Denise L. Johnson |
| Special School District of St. Louis County, Jennings School District, John Cary, Suzanne Foshage, Rob Woerther, Don Bohannon, Hera Didway, DeAndria Player, Carla Addoh, Constance Johnson, Gina Hastey, Renee Hale, Tiffany Anderson, Art McCoy and Hicks Prophet |
| 4:2018cv00053 |
| January 11, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Noelle C. Collins |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Objection to Defendants Removal of Plaintiffs Case Filed in Missouri State Court (ECF 19 ) and Amended Objection to Defendants Removal of Plaintiffs Case Filed in Missouri State Court (ECF 28 ) are DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF 4 ) is DISMISSED as to Defendants the Special School District of St. Louis County and the Jennings School District and that the Special School District of St. Louis Count y and the Jennings School District are DISMISSED from this case; and IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, at the termination of this case, Judgment will be entered incorporating this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 5/10/18. (KJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
