Vinson Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Carson
||Vinson Mortgage Services, Inc.
||Benjamin S. Carson, Sr. and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
||January 18, 2018
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - County
||David D. Noce
|Nature of Suit:
||Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
|Cause of Action:
||05 U.S.C. § 702
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 3, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for consolidation of Vester et al. v. Carson et al., No. 4:18 CV 626, with the instant case (Doc. 35 ) is GRANTED, in that the Clerk is ORDERED to reassign Vester to the undersign ed United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order of Consolidation be filed in Case No. 4:18 CV 626, as well as the instant case, and that all future documents be filed in the respective cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that not later than June 15, 2018, the parties must file a joint proposed scheduling plan for these consolidated actions that addresses any appropriate amendments to the Case Management Order. Upon receipt of the joint proposed scheduling plan, the Court will determine whether a scheduling conference is necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 5/3/18. (JAB)
|April 16, 2018
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff for a determination that defendants have acted in contempt of the Courts stay order issued January 26, 2018, (Doc. 23 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 4/16/17. (JAB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?