Kennedy v. LTI Trucking Services, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Kennedy v. LTI Trucking Services, Inc.

Kennedy v. LTI Trucking Services, Inc.

Plaintiff:	JoAnn L. Kennedy
Defendant:	LTI Trucking Services, Inc.
Case Number:	4:2018cv00230
Filed:	February 9, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Henry Edward Autrey
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 13, 2019	Filing 52 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 38 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 50 ] is DENIED as moot. A separate judgment in accordance with this Opinion, Memorandum, and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/13/19. (KJS)
December 20, 2018	Filing 27 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 20 ] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as to the minimum wage claims, wit hout prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint in accordance with this Opinion, Memorandum, and Order within 14 days of the date of this Order.( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 1/3/2019.). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 12/20/2018. (AAS)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 13, 2019

Filing 52 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 38 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 50 ] is DENIED as moot. A separate judgment in accordance with this Opinion, Memorandum, and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/13/19. (KJS)

December 20, 2018

Filing 27 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 20 ] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as to the minimum wage claims, wit hout prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint in accordance with this Opinion, Memorandum, and Order within 14 days of the date of this Order.( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 1/3/2019.). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 12/20/2018. (AAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kennedy v. LTI Trucking Services, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JoAnn L. Kennedy
Represented By:	Carson C. Menges
Represented By:	Joshua D. Wells
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: LTI Trucking Services, Inc.
Represented By:	Jill R. Rembusch
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?