Magruder Construction Co., Inc. v. Gali
Plaintiff: Magruder Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant: Philip Gali
Case Number: 4:2018cv00286
Filed: February 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: John A. Ross
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 89 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magruder's request for fees and costs under the Settlement Agreement is GRANTED in part. Magruder is awarded the amount of $98,083.02, as and for its attorneys fees and costs. IT IS HEREBY O RDERED that Defendant Philip Gali shall pay Plaintiff Magruder Construction Co., Inc., as reasonable attorneys fees and out-of-pocket costs the sum of $98,083.02, IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff Magruder Construction Co., Inc.'s Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs under ERISA 76 is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/6/2020. (SMM)
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Magruder Construction Co., Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I of the Complaint and First Claim for Relief in the Counterclaim and Partial Summary Judgment on Count II of the Complaint 28 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Magruder's Motion to Take Judicial Notice of the Entire Bank of America Lawsuit Court File 56 is GRANTED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Magruder shall submit its supplemental briefing on the issue of its contract damages. Gali shall have ten (10) days thereafter to file a reply. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/30/2020. (CLO)
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Compel 35 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim [ 40 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Exclude Evid ence [ 44 ] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with the rulings herein.IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Reset Trial Setting andAmend/Modify Pretrial Deadlines [ 61 ] is GRANTED in part. The October 21, 2019 trial settingis VACATED, to be reset once the Court has ruled on Magruders motion for summaryjudgment. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/25/19. (JAB)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Magruder Construction Co., Inc.s motion to dismiss [ 21 ] is GRANTED. Defendant Galis second claim for relief in his Counterclaim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/10/18. (JAB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Magruder Construction Co., Inc. v. Gali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Magruder Construction Co., Inc.
Represented By: David P. Niemeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philip Gali
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?